SENSITIZE 51
Every morning, Mr. Cring takes a personal moment with his friends.
Today: Right person, wrong message. Cring explains how to get the message right.
Click the picture below to see the video
Jonathots Daily Blog
(4295)
Comprehend the fight
To do what’s right
Wrong-headed: Incorrect headed in the wrong direction.
Although some people are critical of our country, I, for one, am astounded that things work as well as they do, considering how wrong-headed we are.
We are misguided. It is not malicious, but certainly is ignorant. And ignorant is a decision to ignore the logical.
Arguably, the most persecuted minorities in our country are the LGBTQ, Jewish and black communities.
Watching television, you are probably convinced that America is fifty percent gay, because they are well-represented in the entertainment industry and have gained the attention of politicians.
Likewise, if you listen to the pundits discussing the election, you might assume that the Jewish vote is at least thirty percent.
And in a quest to find truth, the number of shows and specials which are produced about the exploitation of the black race might cause you to think they are forty to fifty percent of the population.
From the LGBTQ community itself, it is estimated that 4.5 percent of Americans are gay, Lesbian, transgender and such.
Just 2 percent of the country is Jewish.
And 12.1 percent of America is black.
If you add these three numbers, you come up with 18.6 percent of the census.
They are a threat to no one.
They have no plans nor ability to take over our country and turn it into black power, Zionist or homosexual.
I just want to establish the statistics—for it is bad to begin a discussion believing false information. By no means am I offering these facts to make you think that because the numbers of these minorities are small, that they should be treated with disdain.
I’m just saying that you’ll never reach this country until you realize you are appealing that white people be more generous of spirit.
There’s just not much you can do if you’re gay, Jewish and black to change the heart of the United States of America to make it a home more suitable for your feelings.
If you’re a politician, a minister, a community organizer or just a concerned citizen, you should be motivating your white brothers and sisters to comprehend that this 18.6 percent that receives so much ambivalence, if not anger, are indeed “the least of these, my brethren,” that Jesus referred to when he was discussing those who need the most of our love and attention.
The problem in mentioning Jesus is that even though we tout ourselves “a Christian nation,” the religion of our country is…
It is a blending of our cultures, our likes, our religion, our prejudices, our egos and remnants of compassion.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Christianity.
If Jesus preached today, he would not last for three years. He would stir up trouble, get caught up in the 24-hour news cycle, be declared a cult leader and disgraced in two weeks.
Americanity has three premises:
1. America was founded by Europeans—basically white people.
2. Because of that and many other factors, we consider ourselves to be an “exceptional nation.”
3. Even though we accept an amount of integration, we do not want to lose the power of our white color and composition.
I understand that most people would not admit they have bought into these principles. Nevertheless, they are ingrained in you if you are not gay, Jewish or black.
Let me give you an example:
We are a country that is proud that we freed the slaves. Matter of fact, the average white person would point out that this is acceptable restitution—our gift to the black race for stealing them from Africa.
Now let’s take a Bible story everybody knows:
The children of Israel are slaves in Egypt. Moses wants to free them. Let’s say the Pharaoh agrees to free them, but then the slaves remain in Egypt, hanging around with those people who used to be their masters. How successful would that have been? How important was it for the Jews to escape Egypt, so they could really be free?
Yet in America, we tossed freedom to the black man, but forced him to live, work and worship around his former masters.
We promised “forty acres and a mule” and instead, trapped black families in a history that held them in bondage.
Simultaneously…
Even though the LGBTQ community, the black race and the Jewish folk are only 18.6 percent of the population, there is a group that is 52 percent, and they are still treated as a minority.
They are fighting for their lives; they are struggling for their right to be heard. They are pleading for their bodies—they are demanding an equality that should have been guaranteed long ago.
Before we solve the problems with the gays, the Jews and the blacks, we are desperately in need of a GENDER MENDER: a mingling of education, humor and understanding that closes the gap between men and women.
Can you imagine how much easier it would be to grant equality to other minorities if the treatment of women was mitigated by common sense?
Instead, we pretend that women are about one percent of the population and ask them to stand to the rear and wait their turn.
You will not comprehend the difficulties faced by the Jewish race until the bigotry against women is resolved.
And you will never, ever complete the journey of a free America, and open the doors to the LGBTQ community, until men and women in this country arrive at a tender, but firm understanding of their union.
I can certainly assure you, however, that I am…
They have survived the shenanigans of twenty years of war, political lying and cheating and murder in their schools.
They have no stomach for Americanity.
And they are completely turned off to the idea that minorities must stand in line and wait their turn.
Yet even the young humans out there are screwed up on the issue of men and women—borrowing way too much tradition from their parents.
It is time to deal with the BAD. Look at the stats the way they are, realize that America is mostly white and needs to be appealed to for its better angels to make our plans work.
And please, once and for all, can we get rid of the sad Americanity—which believes in red, blue and white supremacy?
I’d like to see us get MAD and start to seek out a way to GENDER MENDER the difficulties between men and women.
Then we can be glad and offer the next generation a better palette, so their painting can be filled with color.
Jonathots Daily Blog
(2820)
When is it right to fight–to stand up for yourself? Everyone I know and everywhere I look, people say you have to “fight back” and “defend yourself.” So what does it mean to “turn the other cheek” or even “thou shall not kill?” And how is it we are a “Christian nation” when fighting and killing and wars are constant?
Let’s begin with the concept of a “Christian nation.”
Jesus never envisioned his work as a country. He said his “kingdom is not of this world.” So the Christian message was intended to be an individual experience. Then these converts were challenged to become “the light of the world,” and affect the climate of society.
So to tout ourselves as a Christian nation, we have blended in the concepts of the Old Testament so that we can obtain a nationalistic flavor. And when you include the Old Testament, you get “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” and vendettas against enemies.
So I don’t know if it’s possible to approach this as a Christian nation without including ideas which Jesus said had been cast aside in favor of more loving and noble adventures.
If we were a Christian nation, our agenda would be simple: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
In other words, take care of those around us and develop a healthy, prejudice-free environment where people can prosper, and in so doing, gain personal peace of mind and solvency.
Then that “city on a hill” could be a testimony to the world and they could begin to measure their philosophies against our philosophy, and decide where they might want to revise their thinking.
Of course, in the process, we must realize that enemies still come along due to jealousy and revenge, but when this happens, we can stand guard without totally destroying those who attack us.
This is exemplified in the Garden of Gethsemane, when Jesus takes eleven men into this secluded place for a time of prayer, asking them if they had the means to defend themselves, and when they said, “We have two swords,” he replied, “It is enough.”
So if we could put together a military without trying to overwhelm our enemies with our prowess, then we would be in a position to take the rest of our money and use it to improve the lives of our citizens instead of constructing an arsenal of intimidation.
You will be told by most people that this idea is childish and stupid. This is why Jesus never intended to take over countries and rule them.
The Christian message is intended to be placed in existing cultures, and through its charity, affect the climate that surrounds it.
So I don’t think there’s an easy answer to this question. Yet I will tell you that the fighting and killing that goes on in our world cannot be attributed to the message of Jesus of Nazareth, because he never intended to possess turf.
And if you ever have to add Old Testament to New Testament to justify your actions, then you are not living under the total spiritual impact of the Kingdom of God.
So I walk in a simple situation:
Whatever it would take to do this is what would be sufficient. Because when eleven men told Jesus they had two swords, he said it was enough.
It certainly is not enough to attack, but it did end up being enough to allow them to escape.
The producers of Jonathots would humbly request a yearly subscription donation of $10 for this wonderful, inspirational opportunity
Jonathots Daily Blog
(2354)
The greatest courtesy I can offer to any of my readers is to attempt to provide a non-prejudiced format of information which is vacant of opinion. (Of course, this is basically impossible to do since I am a mortal, and love to hear the sound of my own voice.) But let me attempt to be more faithful with today’s populie.
In the first one hundred years of our existence as a nation–1776 to 1876–our young, fledgling experiment was involved in nineteen years of war. In other words, 19% of the time we were sending young men off to die in some sort of escapade “for freedom.”
In the next one hundred years–from 1876 to 1976–we were involved in seventeen years of war. 17%. A drop.
From 1976 to 2001, a span of twenty-five years, we took three of those to be involved in war, placing us in a descending 12%.
But from 2001 to present–thirteen years–we have been involved in eleven years of war. An astounding 86% spike.
This increase in blood, guts, aggression and interference has caused us to develop several national policies, quietly, to sustain this burdensome effort. Among them is the popular notion that the military is honorable and should be given special consideration, and the hypocritical populie of “we support the troops.”
Entertainment loves it because even though they tout themselves to be liberals who want to preserve the turtle doves in some park, they have never met a movie that does not require a gun.
Religion favors this populie because it gives us something to pray for, allowing us to feel we’re transforming the world one bullet at a time.
And of course, politicians not only rattle their sabers, but occasionally brandish them to warn infidels and heathen of the power of our nation, while stirring the blood of the voters in their favor.
Do you really want to support the troops? Then get real instead of putting on a phony patriotism and a theatrical appreciation for our men and women who serve. Here’s how you can support the troops:
1. Stop starting wars that have nothing to do with us.
If we really believe we’re a Christian nation, we should only attack if we’re attacked. Period. I will guarantee you that soldiers would be satisfied to be “at readiness” instead of in peril.
2. If you find yourself in the position of starting a war which is considered to be necessary, then institute the draft.
Don’t go to your volunteer army or your reserves and ask them to take on innumerable tours of duty because you don’t want to bother the elite young people of our country. I will tell you, if George W. Bush had instituted the draft in 2003, the Iraq War would not have lasted more than four years, and if it had, there would have been protesters in the street, just as there were in 1970 regarding Vietnam.
3. Take care of the obvious needs of our veterans, granting them the dignity of acclimating back into society without being impoverished second-class citizens.
Don’t tell me you support the troops and then fail to notice that we are not taking care of their medical needs or helping them get off the street–homeless ex-soldiers.
I do not like a charade. Since we have come across the same situation we had in the Civil War, in which our weaponry has outgrown our medical ability to take care of the human body, we might want to slow up the carnage so we don’t have so many combatants trying to move around without limbs and hampered by severe brain injuries.
The United States has decided it’s the Roman Empire, and just as the Romans did, we are beginning to over-extend ourselves under the guise of being the “muscle men of the world”–to eventually be taken down by our version of Vandals from Germany, whom I am sure the Romans also considered to be terrorists.
I support the troops with all my heart–so much so that I work for peace, I challenge avarice and I question my government when it tries to excite the populace by waving the flag over the next conflict.
The producers of jonathots would humbly request a yearly subscription donation of $10 for this wonderful, inspirational opportunity
Please contact Jonathan’s agent, Jackie Barnett, at (615) 481-1474, for information about scheduling SpiriTed in 2014.
Jonathots Daily Blog
(1947)
At first consideration, one would not think that Jerry Springer, the PTL Club, MSNBC and Fox News have much of anything in common.
But having great fun in the middle of the night, awakening from sleep, and doing a little channel surfing on the old TV, I found that all four of them, in the process of a few moments, espoused an identical declaration:
“It’s all about family.”
Even though the words came out of the mouth of a former crack-addicted mother, a black preacher, a liberal lesbian newscaster and a blond bimbo, they were still exactly the same wording and rhetoric.
Matter of fact, I would say that those words are what you would call a “safe haven” for anyone to speak if they wanted to evoke applause.
But doing a little figuring, assuming that there are eight billion people in the world and growing, if each little family consists of about four to eight individuals, then we would have one billion non-connecting units on planet earth, who are mainly concerned about their clump of four to eight people.
Does that frighten you? Does the notion of one billion renegade troupes of human souls, focused only on their own well-being, put a chill down your spine?
But once again, ironically, we refuse to reference Jesus’ feelings and attitudes on this issue, even though we claim to be a Christian nation. So let me refresh you:
Now I do understand that these are all subject to interpretation. Some folks would even say I am taking them out of context. But the sheer glut of evidence lets us know that Jesus wanted us to expand our vision of family to include the entire brotherhood and sisterhood of humankind.
I have an absolutely fabulous family. I would not use the word “proud” in describing my sentiments about them–their lives are their own and I should not garner kudos for their accomplishments. But I will tell you this–I have often upset those immediate kin of mine by including more people into my circle as family than they deemed necessary.
I have three sons who were born of my seed and three others that I took into my home and adopted.
I have young people all over the country I have supported with prayer and encouragement, who I feel close to because I include them in my family.
The notion that we can continue to shrink our vision of fellowship and treat the rest of human beings as either peripheral OR superfluous will cause us to become a more closed society, wracked with indifference.
Here are my three suggestions:
1. Love your family by finding other people who remind you of your family and love them equally.
2. Don’t cut more slack to your family than you do to other people; otherwise, you are on a dangerous road to hypocrisy.
3. Teach your children to love people because they are God’s creation instead of the fact that they’re “your creation.”
The “family way” of doing things in this country is a sly trick, designed to keep us insulated from feeling the pain of others.
If we don’t increase our vision, don’t be surprised if we become blind to the need.
The producers of jonathots would humbly request a yearly subscription donation of $10 for this wonderful, inspirational opportunity
Please contact Jonathan’s agent, Jackie Barnett, at (615) 481-1474, for information about personal appearances or scheduling an event
G-Poppers … March 2nd, 2018
Jonathots Daily Blog
(3599)
They were bombed. Yes, completely bombed out of their minds.
G-Pop is talking about Nikita Khrushchev and Mao Zedong, the first secretary of the Communist Party in Russia and the Chairman of the Communist Party in China, respectively.
They were bombed in the sense that they were intoxicated on the power they felt by possessing an arsenal of nuclear weapons. So inebriated were they on their own power that they frequently threatened the world with destruction.
Fortunately, the world was granted a country called the United States, which possessed a President who refused to take the bait and openly, or at least quietly, lobbied against nuclear proliferation.
Beginning with Eisenhower, then Kennedy, Johnson and even Richard Nixon–all were convinced it was essential that the world be disarmed from the threat of atomic annihilation. It continued with Jimmy Carter and even Ronald Reagan, who tried to negotiate treaties while simultaneously being an usher at the falling of the House of Lenin.
Vladimir Putin of Russia and Kim Jung Un of North Korea are also bombed. They have picked up on the infection of egotistical, maniacal manipulation through the news cycle by threatening humanity with demise.
Here is where G-Pop is concerned: we seem to have lost the American president who stands in the way of these bombed individuals. Unfortunately, some chest-thumping and threats are now coming from the red, white and blue.
We have three leaders in the world who are bombed. At no time in our history has such a precarious imbalance loomed over the precious lives of our children.
It does not do any good to claim to be a Christian nation if we continue to politically and diplomatically live under the pretext of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.”
Sanity must prevail, and we can’t wait for a redemption story to come from the Kremlin or North Korea. It is up to our President to follow the examples of his predecessors and control the danger which might accidentally be unleashed just to prove a point.
G-Pop wants his children to know that much of this Earth is negotiated by balancing. It’s not an issue of compromise, but rather, a deterrent to insanity through seeking the counsel of better “angles.”
We are in trouble.
It’s not because Putin is in Russia or Kim Jung Un is in North Korea. It’s because we’ve lost our perspective as a nation on how foolish it is to intimidate–and how such maneuvers can create alarming predicaments which might force us to back up our claims.
Where is the voice of reason?
Where is the realization that military might is best used in exercises instead of filling body bags?
G-Pop is praying for restraint.
G-Pop, who had a grandson born just today, is attempting to encourage “turn the other cheek,” which allows us to keep our good face alive and well.
The producers of jonathots would humbly request a yearly subscription donation of $10 for this inspirational opportunity
Share this:
Like this:
Tags: American president, arsenal, bombed, China, Christian nation, Communist Party, destruction, Eisenhower, eye for an eye, Jimmy Carter, Johnson, Kennedy, Kim Jung Un, Kremlin, Lenin, Mao Zedong, Nikita Khrushchev, Nixon, nuclear weapons, proliferation, Putin, restraint, Ronald Reagan, Russia, turn the other cheek